GDPR – sounding the death knell for self-learning algorithms?

GDPR – sounding the death knell for self-learning algorithms?

In just a few short months the European General Data Protection Regulation becomes enforceable. This regulation enshrines in law the rights of EU citizens to have their personal data treated in accordance with their wishes. The regulation applies to any organisation which is processing EU citizens’ data, and the UK government has indicated that, irrespective of Brexit, it will implement the regulation in full.

The GDPR regulations are not just about where personal data is stored and the ability to opt out of email spam messages. Article 15 of the regulation specifically mentions the right for individuals to obtain meaningful information about the logic involved in any automatic decision concerning them, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for that individual.

Furthermore, Article 22 establishes the right of individuals to not be subject to an automated decision making process where those decisions significantly affect the individual.

Therefore, organisations need to be able to:

For those organisations that provide credit (e.g. mortgages, personal loans, credit cards) this is nothing new; there are already regulations in place to prevent discrimination and enforce clarity in data usage. It will more deeply impact organisations such as retailers who may make discount offers to some consumers and not others based upon an algorithm. If one consumer is disadvantaged as a result (i.e. gets a worse offer), then they can request an explanation and demand to be exempt from the algorithm.

These regulations have profound implications for data-driven organisations. Clearly, making an automated decision needs to be within a structured framework so that HOW the decision is made can be understood. The analytical model needs to be sufficiently interpretable to allow an explanation of WHY a decision was made about an individual, and WHAT the implications were for that individual. Organisations will also need to be able to explain what data was used to reach that decision, and in the case of important decisions, whether or not the overall decision making process is properly controlled.

Share it:
Share it:

[Social9_Share class=”s9-widget-wrapper”]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You Might Be Interested In

Data Fabric, Data Mesh, And the Cloud: Data Management Architectures for the Future

26 Feb, 2023

While the emerging constellation of next-generation data architectures—fabric, mesh, and cloud—is extremely appealing, it’s still full of unknowns. These approaches …

Read more

What should you include in a Data Governance initiative?

22 May, 2019

One of the many challenges you will have to face when implementing Data Governance is agreeing the scope of the …

Read more

5 Things to Think About When Considering Monetizing Data

27 Mar, 2018

Trey Stephens is the Director of Audience Monetization at Acxiom, where he specializes in connecting offline with online data and …

Read more

Do You Want to Share Your Story?

Bring your insights on Data, Visualization, Innovation or Business Agility to our community. Let them learn from your experience.

Get the 3 STEPS

To Drive Analytics Adoption
And manage change

3-steps-to-drive-analytics-adoption

Get Access to Event Discounts

Switch your 7wData account from Subscriber to Event Discount Member by clicking the button below and get access to event discounts. Learn & Grow together with us in a more profitable way!

Get Access to Event Discounts

Create a 7wData account and get access to event discounts. Learn & Grow together with us in a more profitable way!

Don't miss Out!

Stay in touch and receive in depth articles, guides, news & commentary of all things data.