What’s the Best Multi-Cloud Strategy for Your Organization?

Scaling your business needs robust solutions, and a multi-cloud strategy can exactly help you achieve that. There has been a debate on whether organizations should go for multi-cloud or stick to a single vendor. Recently, one of the users of Reddit posted a question, “Do you need a multi-cloud strategy?”

Responses to the question offer some interesting observations, in which large organizations are considering the multi-cloud strategy as failover situations. Most organizations migrate toward multi-cloud strategies to:

Multi-cloud is a strategy in which organizations seek services from heterogeneous cloud providers. Such providers can be specialized in platform as a service (PaaS), infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and software as a service (SaaS). Multi-cloud can also include public cloud, private cloud and even hybrid cloud service.

The strategy has been quite popular among organizations across the globe. The global market for multi-cloud management will reach more than $1659.6 million by the end of 2020 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 16.1% for the forecast period of 2021-2026.

Here, we are going to discover some fantastic architecture designs for multi-cloud deployments. But, before that, let’s answer the question that most organizations should ask.

Suppose you are a big organization like Spotify and all your data is handled by a single vendor—say Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Now, the streaming service has all the chips on a single vendor here. It is not that GCP is inefficient, but the dependency is higher. So, what to do for the worst-case scenario?

Multi-cloud is an architectural decision for an organization. It helps reduce the dependency on a single vendor and creates a fail-safe.

So, let’s discover some interesting multi-cloud migration strategies for your business.

Re-deployment of an application or software needs refactoring of the architecture. It is a great way to revisit the deployment strategy, especially when you are migrating to multi-cloud. This migration pattern can help transform the existing architecture into a multi-cloud design. It includes pre-defined architecture elements including the service, cloud platform, connectors and even onsite storage devices.

Any service component can be atomic or allow a hierarchical redundancy. Here, before the migration, the component uses services from the on-premises platform. These services can be the coordination of different component architecture or IaaS.

Once we migrate the component to multi-cloud architecture design, the on-premises service is replaced by a public cloud platform. So, the application is re-employed on a cloud platform without higher operational expenses, offering greater virtualizations.

Cloudification design architecture explores the integration of public cloud platforms for added capabilities. Before the migration, the component uses on-premises services without any additional capabilities. It reduces the extensibility, increases redundancy and decreases reusability.

The solution here is simple: You can migrate to the cloudification architecture. Here, the on-premises service is integrated with the existing public cloud platform for extended capabilities.

Sometimes significant changes in the multi-cloud architecture design can increase the operational expenditures.